Posts Tagged ‘Sanitization Technology’

Security Challenges of Solid State Device (SSD) Hard Drives in the Enterprise


In 2011, University of California San Diego (UCSD) researchers released a series of white papers revealing the security flaws found in solid state drives. These whitepapers discuss how, in the race for hard drive OEM’s to get new solid state devices to market, OEM’s haven’t all abided by security protocols set forth by industry standards groups. Because of these oversights in the development process, many drives do not have built in safeguards to perform modern data sanitization and still more concerning is the lack of success of traditional data sanitization methodologies on the drives.

The lack of security is disturbing:

Fig. 1 Data Sanitization method and amount of data recovered
Filesystem delete 4.3 – 91.3%
Gutmann 0.8 – 4.3%
Gutmann “Lite” 0.02 – 8.7%
US DoD 5220.22-M (1996) 0.01 – 4.1%
RCMP TSSIT OPS-II 0.01 – 9.0%
Schneier 7 Pass 1.7 – 8.0%
German VSITR 5.3 – 5.7%
MSR-TR-2005-176 5.6 – 6.5%
British HMG IS5 (Enh.) 4.3 – 7.6%
US Air Force 5020 5.8 – 7.3%
US Army AR380-19 6.91 – 7.07%
Russian GOST P50739-95 7.07 – 13.86%
British HMG IS5 (Base.) 6.3 – 58.3%
Pseudorandom Data 6.16 – 75.7%
Mac OS X Sec. Erase Trash 67.0%
Figure From “Reliably Erasing Data From Flash-Based Solid State Drives

As far back as 2008, LifeSpan has been collaborating with UCSD’s Center of Magnetic Recording and Research (CMRR) and Temple University to test the efficacy and practicality of data sanitization methods. Over the years, we have found that many standards and practices are unique in their process and implementation. The case of SSD hard drives is even more complex. With SSD hard drives, a different procedure is required for effective sanitization and disposal.

These idiosyncrasies are caused because solid-state drives (SSDs) are comprised of flash-based memory chips. The complexity occurs when an intermediate level of technology called a “flash translation layer,” is introduced between the drive controller and the flash memory. Data can be accessed in blocks; however it is translated in flash “pages”. Each of these “flash translation layer” designs is unique to its manufacturer and date.
In contrast, modern day magnetic hard drives have an onboard controller that manages access to information stored on the hard drive. Data is stored in blocks and is typically sanitized with block over-write or SECURE ERASE technology. There are many readily available and reliable software tools available for sanitizing or “wiping” magnetic hard drives.

While internally using a fundamentally different technology, SSDs interface to traditional host interfaces including: SAS, SATA, SCSI and Fiber Channel. All of these are now common to mobile, desktop, and server-based computing and SSD’s can be installed in your current devices without being readily noticeable. With this challenge, a process which has a specific component for identifying SSD’s is important.

In the research paper titled “Reliably Erasing Data From Flash-Based Solid State Drives”, scientists from the UCSD Nonvolatile Systems Laboratory (NVSL) identified weaknesses in existing data destruction techniques. In their research, scientists identified SSDs where SECURE ERASE techniques were employed and data sanitization failed completely. They also found many drives where typical overwrite operations, such as DoD5220-22-M, were employed and the drives still afforded data recovery. As an additional level of complexity, since SSD’s are not magnetic based, degaussing techniques were always ineffective at data destruction.

Over the last several months, LifeSpan has met with researchers at UCSD’s Non-Volatile Systems Labs (NVSL) to discuss these security issues in order to develop commercially viable solutions for drive sanitization and data destruction. In the future, we would like to see a consistent method for sanitization and disposal but because of current market conditions each case needs to be diagnosed individually.
Enterprises and government organizations must assess data breach risks and select the most appropriate process for data sanitization, destruction and disposal for each type of drive. Based on your current distribution of drive manufactures and types, a plan of action needs to be implemented.

Whether you do it yourselves, have a vendor do it for you on site, or have it done at a vendor’s facility, IT Security and Asset Management need a secure and reliable process specifically for SSD’s.

LifeSpan has created an executive briefing that reviews in more detail the technical issues on how data can be recovered as well as destroyed for magnetic and solid state drives, and offers a variety of compliant, data security options to address this new challenge. Click HERE to request more information or call 888-720-0900.

Data Privacy Presentation


LifeSpan had the privilege to present the following report on data privacy at the Institute of scrap Recycling Industries (ISRI) national convention and exposition that was held in San Diego several weeks ago.  With over 4,500 attendees, ISRI is the largest recycling conference in North America.  Among the topics addressed by LifeSpan President Dag Adamson were Data Destruction Services, Sanitization Technology, Benchmarking Strategies, and Third-Party Certifications.

Attached is our presentation on data destruction: ISRI Data Destruction Presentation

Some of the highlights include:

  • What are the market drivers for certifications
  • Highlights AAA NAID Certification
  • Options
  • Sanitization Technology
  • Debunking The triple pass myth (it no longer equals DOD)
  • Latest Standard NIST 800-88
  • Benchmarking Strategies

For more information please email us: info@lifespanrecycling.com or visit us at www.lifespanrecycling.com.